Winners and Losers
Competition is a fact of life; the desire to win at games, get the highest grade in the class or bring home a blue ribbon from the county fair is a feeling most of us can understand. Playing sports provides an outlet for competitive urges; watching your favorite professional teams allows us to compete vicariously.
Competitive urges may also pervade our lives in many other areas: Who has the bigger house? Whose kid got into the better college? Who drives the nicer car? Who has the more prestigious job? Who is better-looking or fitter? Who is more popular, smarter, wittier? People regularly make such comparisons and often feel in competition with their friends and acquaintances, whether or not they realize it. As long as it's not a preoccupation or source of great distress, this is "normal" -- that is to say, competition is everywhere.
Competition becomes toxic, however, when you add the element of triumph. I don't mean that word in its positive sense, as in "His victory was a triumph of self-discipline and fortitude." The triumph I have in mind goes hand-in-hand with the humiliation of others. In this sense, when you are victorious it means there must be a contemptible loser. "Personal best" doesn't apply in that instance; seeing others go down to defeat is a major part of the gratification. Feeling superior to and better than those losers is the goal.
I think this feeling is more commonplace that you might expect. Why, after all, do so many people tune in to reality-based TV shows like "American Idol" or "Project Runway," where week after week, the "losers" are dismissed from the competition by contemptuous judges, often in extremely degrading ways. A very large part of the viewing public must derive satisfaction from witnessing this humiliation, no doubt identifying with the triumphant winner or the sneering judge.