I've always struggled with the term attachment, used in my profession to denote the relationship that is supposed to develop between mother and infant during the earliest months of life. I may be too concrete, but it makes me think of those poor monkeys in Harlow's experiment, clinging to that cloth-covered metal skeleton; it seems to imply a kind of physical connection when in fact, it's all about the emotional relationship. In his video on attachment theory, Allan Schore brings that relationship to life when he speaks about the complex interactions between mother and baby -- the role of eye contact, physical interaction and facial expresions in creating secure "attachment" -- but it still seems to me to be the wrong word.
I've had a similar problem with Kohut's word, mirroring, because to my concrete mind, it suggests that what the mother does is behave like a physical object (a mirror), though lately, I've been feeling better about it. In my work with several different clients, I've been struck anew with the role of our parents' attention in creating our sense of self, how important it is that we feel that we are seen. In a fundamental way, we come to know who we are by witnessing our parents' responses to us; in particular, the joy and love we see in our mother's face convey to us that we are beautiful and important. Allan Schore has shown how the infant comes with a set of inbuilt expectations and behaviors geared to elicit those parental responses; when the reality of an engaged and loving mother meets those expectations, the result is a secure "attachment" (ugh).
Continue "The Invisible Child"